25 Limebush Close, New Haw, Addlestone,Surrey, KT15 3LW
HAV/43UG/LSC/2025/0622 · service charges · Runnymede · decided 8 Oct 2025
The tribunal found the leaseholder liable to pay the service charges set out in the decision for 2018 to 2024, under the lease's service charge clause, with the question of what has been paid and any interest left to the county court.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
which comprises a ground floor purpose-built flat in a block of 10.
- freeholder
The freehold is vested in Lamda GR Limited
- years
2018 £264
- outcome
Suffice it to say that the tribunal is satisfied that the respondent is liable to pay the service charges set out in paragraph 6 above.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.