Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near GU14 7HR

25 Bell Court, Merlin Road, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 7HR

CHI/24UL/LSC/2020/0064 · service charges · Rushmoor · decided 11 Nov 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the balancing service charge for 2018/2019 for lighting and electricity, lift and electrical testing costs recoverable and reasonable, and declined to make a section 20C order.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordA2 Dominion Housing Group Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2018
Items in disputeother, repairs and maintenance, utilities
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£412.47
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : A2 Dominion Housing Group Ltd
years
certain service charges in the year 2018/2019 with a sum of £432.40 in dispute
outcome
I am satisfied that all such sums are recoverable under the lease terms.
total demanded
This charge totalled £412.47.
s20c
I therefore decline to make any such orders in this case having regard to all the circumstances of the same.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.