25-28 North Audley Street London W1k 6WB
LON/00BK/LSC/2020/0135 · service charges · Westminster · decided 27 Oct 2020
The tribunal decided that the leaseholders must contribute under the lease to the £251,360.08 cost of replacing the lift, so the on-account service charge demand is payable.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Blenheims Estate and Asset Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £251,360.08 |
| Total found payable | £251,360.08 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The building has 3 separate entrances for the eighteen self contained flats.
- agent
Ms [name] of Blenheims Estate and Asset Management Ltd for the applicant
- years
the service charges for the year 2020
- outcome
the tribunal determines that the sum of £251,360.08 is payable by the Respondents
- total demanded
the sum of £251,360.08 is payable by the Respondents
- total payable
the sum of £251,360.08 is payable by the Respondents
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 25 Jan 2021.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.