Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near ST1 3GW

24 Wilton Court, Stoke-on Trent, ST1 3GW

BIR/00GL/LSC/2022/0009 · service charges · Stoke-on-Trent · decided 13 Apr 2023

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the leaseholder bound by his lease and liable to pay the £5,132.40 demanded, including his share of roof repair costs and a reserve fund contribution, and the late payment charge was to be cancelled by the managing agent.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companyWedgewood Gardens Management Company Limited
Managing agentMainstay Residential Limited
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2021, 2022
Items in disputeadministration charges, insurance, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£5,132.40
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
The freeholder of the property is Glenthistle Homes Limited.
management company
Wedgewood Gardens Management Company Limited (‘Wedgewood’) is the management company responsible for the management of the subject property under the terms of the lease
agent
Wedgewood has appointed [name] Residential Limited (‘[name]’) as its managing agent.
years
estimated service charges for 2022, some balancing charges for 2021 and an amount for roof refurbishment
outcome
the Tribunal determines that the costs included in the demand for £5132.40 would be reasonably incurred and that the Applicant is liable to pay that sum.
total demanded
the costs included in the demand for £5132.40 would be reasonably incurred
total payable
the Applicant is liable to pay that sum.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.