24 Twyford Court, Fortis Green, Muswell Hill, London N10 3ES
LON/00AP/LAC/2019/0020 · administration charges · Haringey · decided 13 Nov 2019
The tribunal decided that £198 of administration charges for letters of claim sent before debt proceedings were not payable under the lease's forfeiture-costs clause, because the costs were incurred for debt recovery rather than for a section 146 notice.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Rookfield Garden Village Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | £198 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Rookfield Garden Village Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the administration charges claimed by the Applicant in this application are not payable by the Respondent.
- items reduced
The Tribunal therefore finds that the sums claimed are not recoverable as an administration charge pursuant to clause 3(f) of the Respondent’s lease.
- total demanded
administration charges claimed by the Applicant in the sum of £198 are payable
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.