24 & 26 Manor Road, Westcliff on Sea, Essex SS0 7SS
CAM/00KF/LSC/2020/0017 · service charges · Southend-on-Sea · decided 14 Sep 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the damp proofing works and the removal and reinstatement of kitchen and bathroom fittings payable through the service charge, found the estimated costs reasonable, found the consultation requirements complied with, and made orders under section 20C and paragraph 5A extinguishing the respondents' litigation cost liability.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Focustime Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Arkasian Property Management |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the Property was converted into 12 flats (six at No 24 and six at no. 26)
- freeholder
Applicant (Landlord) : Focustime Limited
- agent
Managing Agent : Arkasian Property Management
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the cost of the damp proofing works, and the removal and reinstatement of the kitchen and bathroom fixtures and fittings to enable the damp proofing works to be carried out is payable under the Lease by the Respondents to the Applicant.
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an Order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that the Applicant’s costs in connection with these proceedings should not be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any Service Charge payable by the Respondents.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.