230-240 (Even) Station Road, Balsall Common, Coventry, CV7 7EE
· other · Solihull · decided 1 Mar 2023
The tribunal decided the RTM company must pay the freeholder £3,346.20 in costs under section 88, reducing the amount claimed by one hour of solicitor time and two emails.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | RTMF Services Limited |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £3,915 |
| Total found payable | £3,346.20 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay reasonable costs under section 88 of £2,725.50 plus VAT of £545.10 and land registry fees of £75.6 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Properties comprise six flats, one of which is not let on a long lease.
- outcome
Application for costs under section 88
- total demanded
The total claimed is therefore £3,915.00.
- total payable
The total due is £3,346.20.
- costs
I determine that the reasonable costs payable by the Respondent under section 88 of the Act are £2,725.50 plus VAT of £545.10.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.