23 Ullswater Close, Worcester, WR4 9HN
BIR/47UE/LIS/2018/0006 · LIS · Worcester · decided 16 Jan 2019
The tribunal found the £3,565.07 balcony repair charge for 2017-18 reasonable and recoverable from the leaseholder, as the works were repairs and the statutory consultation requirements had been complied with.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Fortis Living Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £3,565.07 |
| Total found payable | £3,565.07 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a four storey block containing eight flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Fortis Living Limited
- years
the budget cost of repair of £3,565.07 for 2017-18 to be reasonable
- outcome
the Tribunal finds the budget cost of repair of £3,565.07 for 2017-18 to be reasonable and recoverable under the terms of the lease
- total demanded
service charges of £3,565.07 to the Respondent for building works to a balcony
- total payable
the Tribunal finds the budget cost of repair of £3,565.07 for 2017-18 to be reasonable and recoverable under the terms of the lease
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.