23 Honor Oak Park London SE23 1DZ
LON/00AZ/LDC/2019/0166 · dispensation from consultation · Lewisham · decided 29 Oct 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent replacement of the water main pipes serving the three flats, as the work was urgent and cheaper than the quotes obtained; the leaseholders can still challenge the cost later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Guaranteed Investments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the leaseholders of the three flats at the Property
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freeholder and carries out the management of the Property.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements contained in section 20 of the Act
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements contained in section 20 of the Act and the associated Regulations in respect of the qualifying works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.