Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near UB2 5GP

23 Featherstone Court, Featherstone Road, London, UB2 5GP

LON/00AJ/LSC/2025/0862 · service charges · Ealing · decided 4 Feb 2026

The tribunal found all service charges for 2017/18 to 2023/24 reasonable and payable by the leaseholder, and declined to make a section 20C order limiting the landlord's costs.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023
Items in disputecleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

years
all service charges incurred in the service charge years 2017/18 to 2023/24 (inclusive) are reasonable and payable by the applicant
outcome
all service charges incurred in the service charge years 2017/18 to 2023/24 (inclusive) are reasonable and payable by the applicant
s20c
The tribunal declines to make an order under s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.