23 Eridge Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN4 8HJ
CHI/29UQ/LDC/2022/0020 · dispensation from consultation · Tunbridge Wells · decided 27 Apr 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent repairs to soffits, fascia and guttering at 23 Eridge Road, on condition that the decision is sent to all leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the subject Property is a detached converted house which now contains 4 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Southern Land Securities Ltd
- agent
Representative : Together Property Management Ltd
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.