23-27 Hatton Wall, London, EC1N 8JE
LON/00AG/LBC/2020/0040 · breach of lease · Camden · decided 5 Oct 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the proposed survey of the cladding at the building, but made no finding on whether the survey costs are reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | PPR Hatton Wall LLP |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a building comprised of 5 flats and 1 commercial unit over 5 storeys
- outcome
The Tribunal granted the application for the following reasons:
- s20
The Tribunal, therefore, concluded that the Respondents would not be prejudiced by the failure to consult by the Applicant and the application was granted as sought.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.