22B Furley Road, London, SE15 5UQ
LON/00BE/LSC/2021/0127 · service charges · Southwark · decided 22 Oct 2021
The tribunal found the landlord's managing agent could not recover the £2,581 demanded for 2020/21 and 2021/22 because the lease makes no provision for these charges, and ordered the respondent to repay £300 in fees and made orders preventing the landlord's proceedings costs being added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Hua Property Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | £2,581 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant application and hearing fees £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are two flats at the property
- agent
[name] Property Management Limited (HPM)
- years
initially for the year 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2021
- outcome
the respondent is not entitled to recover the sums that have been claimed in two demands
- items reduced
we disallow them in full
- total demanded
The total of these two demands was £2,581
- s20c
The tribunal makes orders under s20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- costs
the respondent should reimburse the applicant the application and hearing fees totalling £300
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.