226 Upper Richmond Road, London, SW15 6TG
LON/00BJ/LRM/2023/0009 · right to manage · Wandsworth · decided 9 Sep 2024
The Tribunal dismissed the right to manage claim because fewer than half of the qualifying tenants were members, and assessed the landlord's recoverable section 88 costs at £27,131 inclusive of VAT, with no penal costs order against the landlord.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Heavenly Homes London Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 14 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to pay the respondent £27,131 (inclusive of VAT) under section 88 of the 2002 Act |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
there are 14 flats in the Premises
- freeholder
Respondent : Heavenly Homes London Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal assesses that costs of £27,131 (inclusive of VAT) are payable by the Applicant to the Respondent pursuant to section 88 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
- costs
costs of £27,131 (inclusive of VAT) are payable by the Applicant to the Respondent pursuant to section 88 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 26 Jun 2023.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.