Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near NW3 6DH

226 Finchley Road, NW3 6DH

LON/00AG/LSC/2023/0087 · service charges · Camden · decided 22 Aug 2023

The tribunal found the interim service charges for 2020/21 to 2022/23 reasonable and payable, ordered the respondents to reimburse the £100 tribunal fee, and refused a section 20C order, with final accounts still open to challenge.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordFreeholders of 226 Finchley Road Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 5 flats
Service charge years in dispute2021
Items in disputeinsurance, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondents to reimburse the applicant's tribunal fee of £100

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
converted to create five flats
freeholder
Applicant : [name] of 226 Finchley Road Ltd
years
29.9.20-28.9.21: [name] 1: £13,383; [name] 2: £3,650;
outcome
The Tribunal finds that the following interim service charges are reasonable and payable:
s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the
costs
The tribunal determines that the Respondents shall pay the Applicant

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.