226 Finchley Rd London NW3 6DH
LON/00AG/LDC/2021/0267 · dispensation from consultation · Camden · decided 10 Dec 2021
The Tribunal refused the landlord's application to dispense with the section 20 consultation requirements for handrail, guardrail and tiling works, so full consultation must be carried out before the works begin.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation refused |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Freeholders of 226 Finchley Road Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] of 226 Finchley Road Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it will not exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for the reasons set out below.
- s20
The Tribunal therefore declines to exercise its discretion under s20ZA.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.