22 The Steyne, Bognor Regis, West Sussex PO21 1TP
CHI/45UC/LAM/2021/0003 · appointment of a manager · Arun · decided 3 Sep 2021
figures not yet checkedNo plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to repay the applicant £300 fees within 28 days |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are only the three flats and so any cost will be borne by a small number of contributors.
- outcome
The Applicant’s application for the appointment of a manager for is granted.
- s20c
The Tribunal finds in all the circumstances that it is just and equitable to disallow recovery of such of the costs incurred by the Respondent as could otherwise be charged through the service charge.
- costs
The Respondent shall repay the £300 fees paid by the Applicant within 28 days.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.