22 Stockleigh Road, St Leonards On sea, East Sussex, TN38 0JP
CHI/21UD/LDC/2019/0038 · dispensation from consultation · Hastings · decided 1 Jul 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for additional structural works found after the original contract started, on condition that the landlord pays £1,500 towards one lessee's legal costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Carlton Property Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £40,182.80 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to contribute £1,500 to the respondent towards legal representation costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
Representative : Carlton Property Management
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- total demanded
indicated to cost £40,182.80
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- costs
The Applicant contributing £1,500 .00 to the First Respondent in respect of costs of legal representation.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.