22 Camden High Street, London NW1 0JH
LON/00AG/LSC/2019/0248 · service charges · Camden · decided 24 Oct 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the proposed major works costs unreasonable, including excessive scaffolding costs, so the section 20 consultation must be repeated, and the landlord must refund the applicant's tribunal fees and cannot pass its tribunal costs through the service charge.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Independent Developments Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Pelham Associates |
| Building | A block · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to refund the applicant's tribunal fees of £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The correct respondent is Independent Developments Limited
- agent
Mr [name] of [name] Associates
- outcome
the costs suggested by the Respondent to be incurred for the works fall foul of S27(A)(3) and would not be reasonable or payable
- items reduced
the costs suggested by the Respondent to be incurred for the works fall foul of S27(A)(3) and would not be reasonable or payable
- s20c
the tribunal orders that it is just and equitable in the circumstances for an order to be made under section 20c of the 1985 Act
- s20
the s20 procedure be undertaken again
- costs
the Respondent shall pay the Applicant £300 within 28 days of this Decision, in respect of the reimbursement of the tribunal fees paid by the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.