22 Burton House, Lady Park Court, Leeds, LS17 8FP
MAN/00DA/LSC/2023/0083 · service charges · Leeds · decided 2 Jul 2025
The tribunal reduced the 2021/22 cleaning charges by £9.14 because consultation was not carried out for part of a long-term cleaning contract, but found the rest of the charges payable and reasonable and refused to restrict the landlord's legal costs.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Leeds Jewish Housing Association |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 25 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a purpose built 3-storey block of 25 rented and shared ownership 2-bedroom flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Leeds Jewish Housing Association
- years
the Application now relates solely to 4 service charge years, namely 2021 / 2022 to 2024 / 2025, i.e., the calendar year service charges for 2020 to 2023
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the services charges for the cleaning services for 2021 / 2022 for the Property should be reduced by the sum of £9.14.
- items reduced
The Tribunal determines that the services charges for the cleaning services for 2021 / 2022 for the Property should be reduced by the sum of £9.14.
- s20c
The Tribunal declines to make an order under s 20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 or sch 11 para 5A Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
- s20
the Respondent accepts that the Cleaning Contract was a qualifying long-term agreement pursuant to s 20 LTA 1985 and thus should have been subject to the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.