22 Brookes Court, Baldwin Gardens, London EC1N 7RR

LON/00AG/LSC/2020/0291 · service charges · Camden · decided 30 May 2021

figures not yet checked

The tribunal accepted the heating and hot water charges for 2015/16 and 2016/17 in full, reduced the charges for 2017/18 to 2019/20 by 10% each and the 2020/21 interim charge by 25%, and ordered the landlord to refund £300 in tribunal fees.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	2015, 2016
Items in dispute	utilities
Items disallowed or reduced	utilities
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to reimburse the applicant's tribunal fees £300

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

years: for heating and hot water in respect of the years 2015/16;
outcome: 2017 – 2018 £755 (reduction of 10% from £838.23)
items reduced: 2017 – 2018 £755 (reduction of 10% from £838.23)
s20c: so that none of the Respondent’s costs of the tribunal proceedings may be passed to the Applicant through any service charge.
costs: the Respondent shall pay the Applicant £300 within 28 days of this Decision

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.