22 Amelia Street, London SE17 3BY: Tribunal Case Reference
LON/00BE/LSC/2023/0219 · service charges · Southwark · decided 4 Nov 2024
The Tribunal found the service charges challenged for 2020-21 to 2023-24 reasonable and payable, with building safety items left undetermined because government funds covered them, and the section 20C costs applications to be decided later on written submissions.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | 22 Amelia Street Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 164 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the lessees of 4 of 164 flats at The Printworks, a block
- freeholder
Respondent : 22 [name] Street Ltd
- outcome
the costs taken into account in determining the amount of the service charges for 2020-21, 2021-22 and 2022-23 and challenged in these proceedings were reasonably incurred and so the service charges are payable.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.