21A Trafalgar Road, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk NR30 2LD
CAM/33UD/LBC/2021/0009 · breach of lease · Great Yarmouth · decided 28 Jun 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found breach of the repair covenant for three windows, reduced the administration charges demanded from £10,965.86 to £3,099.07, and made a section 20C order so the applicants' costs of the proceedings cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £3,099.07 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
determines that administration charges of £3,099.07 are payable under the lease by the Respondent to the Applicants (for pre-action legal and other costs)
- items reduced
Accordingly, in our assessment, the total administration charges payable by the Respondent to the Applicants under clause 6.13 of the lease
- total demanded
Total 10,965.86 3,099.07
- total payable
the total administration charges payable by the Respondent to the Applicants under clause 6.13 of the lease in respect of the costs demanded on 20 November 2021 are in the sum of £3,099.07
- s20c
orders that all the costs incurred by the Applicants in connection with these proceedings are not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the Respondent
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.