21 Sillwood Road Brighton East Sussex BN1 2LF
CHI/00ML/LUS/2024/0003 · LUS · Brighton and Hove · decided 24 Feb 2025
The Tribunal determined that the Respondent must pay the RTM company £5,267.66 of accrued uncommitted service charges held on the acquisition date under section 94 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | ML Property Co Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Austin Rees Limited |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,012.70 |
| Total found payable | £5,267.66 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
which was converted to form 4 flats
- freeholder
Respondent : ML Property Co Limited
- agent
The Respondent instructed Austin Rees Limited as the management company for the property
- years
The debt of £8,500 owed to the freeholder cannot be transferred to the RTM Company.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that £5,267.66 is the payment that falls to be made to the Applicant by the Respondent under section 94(2) of the Act.
- total demanded
the sum of £4,012.70 being the balance of the Reserves as at 9 August 2023
- total payable
The Tribunal determines that £5,267.66 is the payment that falls to be made to the Applicant by the Respondent under section 94(2) of the Act.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.