21 Kilnbarn Court, Haywards Heath, West Sussex RH16 4SE

· other · Mid Sussex · decided 14 Aug 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal reduced the applicant's 2017/18 grounds maintenance and cleaning charges to £100 and £50, found the management fee and other charges payable, and made a section 20C order preventing the landlord's costs of the proceedings being added to the service charge.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Accent Housing Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat, 6 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2016, 2017
Items in dispute	cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reduced	cleaning and grounds
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	£946.98
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: The Applicant's block itself contains 6 flats, as does one other block
freeholder: Respondent : Accent Housing Limited
years: £726.09 for 2016/17 and £1148.77 for 2017/18
outcome: is £100 for 2017/18
items reduced: is £100 for 2017/18
total payable: Total £946.98
s20c: it does consider it just and equitable to make an order under section 20C

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.