Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near NW6 7XG

21 Dyne Road, London, NW6 7XG

LON/00AE/LDC/2015/0143 · dispensation from consultation · Brent · decided 3 Apr 2019

The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent damp repair works to the building carried out in October 2015, on condition that the landlord bears its own costs of the application.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordApplecroft Properties Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentMayfield Asset and Property Management
BuildingA block
Service charge years in dispute2015
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£6,850
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe applicant to bear its own costs of this application

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

agent
managing agents of the Building, Mayfield Asset and Property Management
years
in the week commencing 25 October 2015
outcome
The tribunal grants the applicant retrospective dispensation
total demanded
at an cost of £6,850 plus VAT
s20
The tribunal grants the applicant retrospective dispensation
costs
the applicant is to bear its own costs of this application

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.