21 Calder, Barkisland Mill, Beestonley Lane, Barkisland, Halifax, HX4 0HG
MAN/00CY/LAC/2020/0006 · administration charges · Calderdale · decided 17 May 2021
The Tribunal found that the fees for a Notice of Assignment, a Deed of Covenant and a Notice of Underletting are not administration charges under the Act, so it has no jurisdiction to decide whether they are payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Gray’s Inn Capital Limited |
| Management company | Simarc Property Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Simarc Property Management Ltd (“Simarc”) is the Management Company and Gray’s Inn Capital Limited the Landlord.
- management company
Simarc Property Management Ltd (“Simarc”) is the Management Company
- outcome
The charges for the Notice of Assignment, Deed of Covenant and Notice of Underletting are not Administration Charges in accordance with Schedule 11 Paragraph 1 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (“The Act”).
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.