21 Belsize Lane, London NW3 5AS
LON/00AG/LAM/2020/0018 · appointment of a manager · Camden · decided 3 Dec 2020
figures not yet checkedNo plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Belsize Garages Project Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse fees paid by the applicant |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property comprises a purpose-built building containing 10 flats.
- freeholder
Respondent : Belsize Garages Project Limited
- outcome
make an order appointing Ms [name] as manager of the Property pursuant to section 24 of the 1987 Act
- s20c
it is just and convenient and entirely appropriate to make such an order
- costs
the tribunal is prepared to order reimbursement of fees as requested by the Applicants
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.