21-47 (odd numbers only) Victoria Road, Bradford, BD10 8AQ
MAN/00CX/LDC/2019/0010 · dispensation from consultation · Bradford · decided 6 Aug 2019
The tribunal dispensed with the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof works at Victoria Road because the roof leaked repeatedly and the leaseholders suffered negligible financial prejudice, although the landlord had failed to issue a required notice of the tender details.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
being a development of 14 flats located in three distinct and co-joining blocks
- outcome
are dispensed with in respect of the proposed roof works
- s20
The Applicant failed to issue a notice to leaseholders at this point.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.