21-27 Westmeads Road, Whistable, Kent CT5 1LW
CHI/29UC/LSC/2023/0138 · service charges · Canterbury · decided 21 May 2024
The tribunal found the 2023 management charge of £567.78 for arranging the building insurance payable by the tenants, and made no order under section 20C or paragraph 5A.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £567.78 |
| Total found payable | £567.78 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 2 flats on the first floor and 2 flats on the 2nd floor.
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
- years
for the year 2023 relating to buildings insurance charges and associated fees
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the management charge of £567.78 for 2023 is payable to the Landlord by the Tenants.
- total demanded
The total value in dispute is £567.78.
- total payable
The Tribunal determines that the management charge of £567.78 for 2023 is payable to the Landlord by the Tenants.
- s20c
The Tribunal has therefore determined that it will make no orders at this stage
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.