21-25 Eaglegate, East Hill Colchester, Essex CO1 2PR
CAM/22UG/LRM/2022/0003 · right to manage · Colchester · decided 20 Oct 2022
The tribunal ordered the respondent freeholder to repay the RTM company's £100 application fee, but refused any further costs order because the respondent was not shown to have acted unreasonably.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant's tribunal application fee £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Assethold Limited
- outcome
orders the Respondent to pay £100 to the Applicant to reimburse the tribunal application fee paid by the Applicant
- costs
orders the Respondent to pay £100 to the Applicant to reimburse the tribunal application fee paid by the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.