Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SW15 2FU

204 Smyth Building 89 Upper Richmond Road London SW15 2FU

LON/00BJ/LSC/2024/0756 · service charges · Wandsworth · decided 28 Jul 2025

The tribunal found the mobile warden service charges demanded from the Smyth Building leaseholders for 2019/2020 to 2024/2025 payable and reasonable, and refused section 20C and paragraph 5A orders and a fee refund.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordA2 Dominion Housing Options Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 12 flats
Service charge years in dispute2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
the Smyth Building consisting of 12 apartments
years
the sums demanded from the Applicants as a service charge for the years 2019/2020 to 2024/2025 in respect of the mobile warden service are payable and reasonable
outcome
the sums demanded from the Applicants as a service charge for the years 2019/2020 to 2024/2025 in respect of the mobile warden service are payable and reasonable
s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.