204 Chandos Road, London E15 1TB
LON/00BB/LSC/2020/0019 · service charges · Newham · decided 14 Oct 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found all the service charges claimed for 2017/18 and 2018/19 reasonable and payable, leaving £955.50 due after the tenant's payments, and refused an order under section 20C.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Foxtone Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | major works, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,215.50 |
| Total found payable | £2,215.50 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 8 lessees in the block.
- freeholder
The Applicant is the current proprietor of the freehold interest of 204 Chandos
- years
2017/18 and £1080.39 for 2018/19.
- outcome
11. In summary the Tribunal finds that all of the sums claimed by the Applicant
- total demanded
These sums are £2215.50.
- total payable
These sums are £2215.50.
- s20c
There is no basis for exercising our discretion in relation to s.20C in this case.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.