203 Cudweed Court, 2 Watergate Walk, London E14 9XH
LON/00BG/LSC/2023/0098 · service charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 20 May 2025
The tribunal found the service charges levied by the Second Respondent reasonable for 2019 to 2022, apart from agreed refunds of electricity charges for the gym, and made no section 20C order or fee refund.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Anglo Fortune Estate Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 57 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | utilities |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Cudweed Court consists of 57 flats and is one of four blocks at 45
- agent
Anglo Fortune Estate Management Limited (“Anglo Fortune”) who have managed the Estate since 1 October 2021
- years
The Applicants challenge the service charges payable over the period November 2019 to March 2023.
- outcome
the Tribunal finds that the service charges levied by the Second Respondent are reasonable
- items reduced
The Second Respondent has agreed that a refund should be made in respect of the electricity charges passed down through the service charge
- s20c
The Tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 against either the First or the Second Respondents.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.