20 Upper Wickham Lane, Welling, Kent, DA16 3HE
LON/00AD/LCP/2021/0015 · LCP · Bexley · decided 25 May 2022
The tribunal decided that the RTM company must pay the landlord's reasonable costs of its right to manage claim, assessed at £14,977.92 after reductions to the claimed hourly rates, agent's fees and Upper Tribunal costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £14,977.92 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant costs of £14,977.92 for right to manage claim, after tribunal deductions |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Assethold Limited
- outcome
The costs payable by the Respondent in respect of its claim for the Right to Manage (‘RTM’) are £14,977.92.
- total payable
The costs payable by the Respondent in respect of its claim for the Right to Manage (‘RTM’) are £14,977.92.
- costs
The costs payable by the Respondent in respect of its claim for the Right to Manage (‘RTM’) are £14,977.92.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.