20 Hazel House, Sycamore Avenue, Woking GU22 9FE
CHI/43UM/LSC/2020/0060 · service charges · Woking · decided 21 Oct 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the leaseholder's application about a credit and a 2016 deficit on her account because the issue was one of accounting, which the tribunal has no jurisdiction over, and it made a section 20C order preventing the management company from recovering its costs of the proceedings from her.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Willow Reach Residents Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | HML Group |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Respondent : Willow Reach Residents Management Company Limited
- agent
Representative : HML Group
- years
On 30th May 2019 a credit was applied to the account called “FTT Credit 2015-2018”.
- outcome
I dismiss the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.