Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near L30 9SQ

20 Galsworthy Avenue, Bootle L30 9SQ

MAN/00BY/LSC/2025/0622 · service charges · Sefton · decided 6 Jul 2026

figures not yet checked

The tribunal dismissed the leaseholder's challenge, finding the fire-stopping and render service charges were reasonable and that the consultation did not need to be repeated.

OutcomeDismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2022, 2023
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£8,436.27
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

years
The Works were carried out in 2022 and 2023 by Sovini Property Services.
outcome
1. The application is dismissed.
total demanded
the sum in dispute is £8,436.27 in relation to the Render and the Fire Stopping Compartmentation.
s20c
No application is made for an order pursuant to s 20C LTA 1985 but had there been such an application, given the findings of the Tribunal, the application would be refused.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.