20 and 22 Co-operation Street, Enderby, Leicester, Leicestershire LE19 4NG
BIR/31UB/LIS/2018/0070 · LIS · Blaby · decided 4 Sep 2019
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal found the 2013/14 window repairs and courtyard lights charges not payable for that year, capped accountancy fees at £300 plus VAT a year, reduced 2016/17 and 2017/18 insurance to estimated reasonable amounts, made no order under the litigation costs application, and made a section 20C order in the leaseholders' favour.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Options East Midlands Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The eight flats are served by a gated courtyard
- freeholder
Respondent : Options East Midlands Ltd
- years
service charge years 2013/2014, 2014/2015, 2015/2016, 2016/2017 and 2017/2018
- outcome
the Tribunal finds that for the purposes of the Application these costs were not incurred in the service charge year 2013/2014
- items reduced
a sum £300.00 (plus VAT) is a reasonable amount for such accountancy fees (including bookkeeping) in each of the service charge years specified in the Application
- s20c
the Tribunal in exercise of its discretion under section 20C determines that it is just and equitable to make an order in favour of the Applicants
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.