20 & 20a Woodcote Road Wallington Surrey SM6 0NN
LON/00BF/LDC/2026/0025 · dispensation from consultation · Sutton · decided 2 Jun 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent drainage and CCTV works to eradicate a rat infestation at the building, and said the reasonableness of the costs can be challenged later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2025 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Southern Land Securities Limited
- agent
Together Property Management
- years
The first report of rat’s infestation/foul smell was received on 27/08/2025.
- outcome
The tribunal grants the dispensation from consultation sought by the applicant in respect of the works required
- s20
The tribunal grants the dispensation from consultation sought by the applicant in respect of the works required
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.