20 Alexandra Terrace, Exmouth, Devon, EX8 1BD
HAV/18UB/LDC/2026/0055 · dispensation from consultation · East Devon · decided 15 May 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent works to renew the flat roof and associated scaffolding at the building, but made no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | C A Church Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Remus Management |
| Building | A block, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The applicant is C A Church Ltd, represented by Remus Management.
- agent
Ms [name] of Remus Management confirmed that she has not received any objections
- outcome
The applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
- s20
The applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.