Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near GL7 2PZ

2 The Waterloo Cirencester, GL7 2PZ

CHI/23UC/LDC/2023/0013 · dispensation from consultation · Cotswold · decided 4 May 2023

The tribunal refused the landlord's application for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for major repair works carried out to the building before the applicant had registered title to it.

OutcomeDismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation refused
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordR M Residential Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
The tribunal declines to exercise its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA in respect of the works required to repair the building known as 2 The Waterloo Cirencester GL7 2PZ
s20
The tribunal declines to exercise its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA in respect of the works required to repair the building known as 2 The Waterloo Cirencester GL7 2PZ

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.