2 The Mansion House, Lord Austin Drive, Marlbrook, Bromsgrove B60 1RB
BIR/47UB/LIS/2020/0029 · LIS · Bromsgrove · decided 7 Dec 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided that the Apartment Block Service Charge for Apartment 2 should be apportioned by floor area percentage for all services, giving Apartment 2 a share of 10.2124%, and made orders limiting the landlord's litigation costs and extinguishing the applicant's liability for litigation costs under paragraph 5A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Mainstay Residential Limited |
| Management company | The Mansion House RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The original design for The Mansion House was for 7 Apartments as follows:
- management company
Respondent : The Mansion House RTM Company Limited
- agent
Managing Agent : Mainstay Residential Limited
- years
incurred for the years ending 31st December 2018, 2019 and to be incurred for the year ending 31st December 2020
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that a reasonable and payable apportionment of the Apartment Block Service Charge is that the cost of all Apartment Block Services is apportioned by a percentage based upon the floor area of each Apartment.
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an Order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that the Respondent’s costs in connection with these proceedings should not be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any Service Charge payable by the Applicants.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.