2 Signal House, 3 Seager Place, London SE8 4HJ
LON/00AZ/LSC/2022/0013 · service charges · Lewisham · decided 31 Oct 2022
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal found the service charges demanded for 2016, 2017, 2020, 2021 and the estimated 2022 budget reasonable and payable in full, and refused the leaseholder's request for orders limiting landlord's litigation costs.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Freshplant Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to pay the respondent nothing; Tribunal declined to order repayment to the applicant of his £300 applicati |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
divided into five self-contained flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Freshplant Ltd
- years
service charge demands served by the Respondent on the Applicant for the years 2016, 2017, 2020 and 2021 are reasonable in amount and are payable in full by him
- outcome
are reasonable in amount and are payable in full by him
- s20c
the Tribunal declines to make orders under either of the above sections in favour of the Applicant
- costs
further declines to order the repayment to the Applicant of his £300 application and hearing fees
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.