2 Newthorn Place, Marine Road, Prestatyn LL19 7HY
BIR/00NG/LIS/2019/0046 · LIS · Denbighshire · decided 22 Oct 2019
The tribunal found the service charges and insurance demanded for Newthorn Place reasonable and payable by the first respondent, with the second respondent liable for one service charge, and allowed the landlord's administration charges, interest and costs in part.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Tapestart Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats · 5 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £5,556 |
| Total found payable | £1,601.99 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the first respondent to pay £5073.50 in costs and court fees |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant : Tapestart Limited
- years
for years 2016, 2017 and 2018 in the case of the first Respondent and for 2018 in the case of the second Respondent
- outcome
It is also satisfied the service charges and insurance demands are reasonable and payable.
- total payable
Total £1601.99
- costs
Total payable for costs is £5073.50.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.