2 Market Place, Wallingford, OX10 0EJ
CAM/38UD/LDC/2025/0661 · dispensation from consultation · South Oxfordshire · decided 3 Nov 2025
The tribunal refused the landlord's application to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements for the roof replacement works, so each leaseholder's contribution is capped at £250.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | AMH Properties Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
consist of 4No. flats on first and second floors
- freeholder
Landlord : AMH Properties Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal does NOT grant dispensation from any and all of the
- s20
The maximum sum to be chargeable by service charge contribution, to each leaseholder of the 4 flats at this Property, for this work, is therefore capped at £250.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.