2 Langstone Close, Babbacombe, Torquay, Devon TQ1 3TY
CHI/00HH/LAM/2021/0008 · appointment of a manager · Torbay · decided 11 Jan 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the application to appoint a manager, finding that although some service charges were unreasonable, the breach was not serious enough to make it just and convenient to make the order.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Proxim Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 54 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | reserve fund, administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The estate consist of 54 long residential leases.
- agent
the managing agent Proxim Property Management Limited which we found to be unreasonable
- outcome
This Tribunal therefore dismissed the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.