2 Hawkley House, 24-26 Chapel Street, Billericay, CM12 9LU
CAM/22UB/LSC/2025/0727 · service charges · Basildon · decided 8 Jun 2026
The tribunal barred the landlord Assethold Limited from further participation after it failed to comply with directions, summarily determined that no unpaid charges are payable for the Flat 2 leaseholder, and gave the RTM company a final opportunity to prepare its case on the uncommitted service charges owed to it.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse application fee £114 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
(1) Assethold Limited (“Assethold”) is barred from further participation in
- years
copies of all service charge demands and statements for each leaseholder for all service charge periods which include 2023 or 2024
- outcome
determines summarily that no unpaid service charges or administration charges are payable to Assethold by [name]
- costs
by 26 June 2026 Assethold must pay £114 to [name]
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.