2 Grantham Hall, Torquay TQ1 2HJ

CHI/00HH/LDC/2019/0024 · dispensation from consultation · Torbay · decided 13 Aug 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal agreed to dispense with the section 20 consultation requirements, found the £6,360 service charge demanded for 2018 reasonable and payable in full, and ordered that the landlord's costs of the tribunal proceedings cannot be recovered through the service charge.

Outcome	Payable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Dispensation granted
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	2018
Items in dispute	other, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	£6,360
Total found payable	£6,360
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

years: service charges as demanded for the year 2018 was reasonable
outcome: the tenant Mr [name] was liable to pay that amount in full
total demanded: the £6,360 contribution to
total payable: Accordingly the Tribunal determines that the £6,360 contribution to
s20c: The Tribunal makes an order under Section 20C of the Landlord and
s20: it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.