2 Fulwood Park, Liverpool, L17 5AG
MAN/00BU/LDC/2019/0028 · dispensation from consultation · Liverpool · decided 25 Sep 2019
The Tribunal granted dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for dry rot remedial works at 2 Fulwood Park because leaseholders were not shown to have been prejudiced by the lack of consultation.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | 2 Fulwood Park Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the eight residential apartments which comprise the Property
- management company
The application was made on behalf of 2 Fulwood Park Management Company Limited
- outcome
Compliance with the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to works to remedy dry rot within the Property.
- s20
dispensation must be granted
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.