2-9 Cambridge Gate, London NW1 4JX
LON/00AG/LDC/2021/0079 · dispensation from consultation · Camden · decided 28 Jun 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent remedial works to the communal boilers in the basement of House 5, 2-9 Cambridge Gate.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Cambridge Gate Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Burlington Estates Ltd |
| Building | A block, 26 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises ten period town houses which have been subsequently converted to form 26 self-contained flats
- management company
Applicant : Cambridge Gate Management Limited
- agent
Representative : Burlington Estates Ltd
- outcome
The tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from the statutory
- s20
The tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of urgent remedial works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.